5 Ways to Optimize Application Sourcing Costs in an AI-Enabled Market
Application sourcing —software, support, labor and managed services — presents a prime opportunity to reduce spend and improve value realization.
We have +15 years' experience helping enterprise clients compare defined services to the market.
We have the data and know-how to help you benchmark cost, quality and productivity across all functional areas of business and IT, including:
Find out the right benchmarking services for your needs and strategic objectives.
Price
Staffing rates, contract pricing and competitiveness
Cost
Total cost of ownership (TCO) and industry benchmarks
Performance
SLAs, user experience and provider relationships
Contract
Price, terms and conditions
Are total staffing levels and staffing utilization right for each functional area?
How do our level of assets compare? Are we providing the right service levels to users?
Are we spending the right amount of money in total, and by major functional area?
Where are the variances from leading practices?
Why and where are there gaps? How do we drive sustainable improvement?
What are the high impact, high ROI changes we can make in the immediate term?
Are there services currently provided in-house that should be outsourced, or vice versa?
What complexity or constraints could be alleviated through automation or simplification?
Outsourcing contracts become uncompetitive over time, but it’s difficult to know when it will happen – or by how much.
Whether you want to benchmark your outsourcing contracts’ price, compare your internal service delivery cost to the market or both, ISG gives you at-a-glance visibility into price competitiveness via a single-pane dashboard, plus access to deep dives into real-time IT industry market price intelligence.
In addition to the above project based price benchmarking services, you can also monitor the price competitiveness of your contracts in real time using using the ISG Probenchmark® price monitoring service.
Acting on timely, accurate and actionable price data allows enterprises to more quickly respond to changes in market prices and make more strategic decisions regarding their IT services.
To get a complete picture of your landscape, you need to understand your service quality and personnel productivity, potential efficiencies and gaps, user satisfaction, and how all these elements relate to cost and compare to the market.
We offer a holistic benchmarking solution that gives real-time, online dashboard visibility into the three key components of performance:
By comparing your spend, staffing allocations and performance across the enterprise, we help you identify opportunities to improve your financial and operational performance.
TCO Benchmark: Compares your total cost of ownership against industry standards of cost, quality and productivity for a variety of IT products and services.
Industry Benchmark: Compares costs against industry metrics, such as IT spend as a percent of revenue.
Get real-time access to cost benchmarking data with ISG Inform™.
Build a defense against the risks of fixed-price long-term contracts. Compare your contract price, terms and conditions to the market and know when your contract falls out of favor.
The terms and conditions of your contracts set guidelines of acceptable behavior, but they are evolving entities – and you need to manage that evolution. A commitment to benchmarking your contracts is a commitment to progress and improvement.
An ISG contract terms and conditions assessment can:
KPIs and SLAs are essential for tracking performance in terms of achieving strategic goals and making decisions. In the best of cases, KPIs can serve as an early warning system to let you know when you are heading off course and where
action might be needed.
An ISG performance benchmark compares your performance against industry peers and leaders and gives you a cost-effective approach to share, compare, improve, and transform internal functions and processes.
SLA Benchmark
assesses service levels against the market, including both performance levels and structure
User Experience Benchmark
measures the impact of technology on users, including customer satisfaction
ISG is a leader in proprietary research, advisory consulting and executive event services focused on market trends and disruptive technologies.
Get the insight and guidance you need to accelerate growth and create more value.
Learn MoreCollaborative Supply Chain Forecasting (CSCF) is a business discipline involving multiple supply chain stakeholders, including suppliers, distributors and sellers, that is aimed at producing a more accurate forecast of future demand and supply. Participants share supply and demand data, forecasts, assumptions and insights to improve visibility, reduce inefficiencies and attenuate supply-demand mismatches. ISG asserts that by 2028, one-third of larger enterprises will have adopted some form of CSCF to reduce costs and improve customer service and supplier relations. However, there are serious challenges to widespread adoption.
The emergence of natural language analytics interfaces driven by generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) models has accelerated enterprise initiatives to enable data democratization—making data available to business decision-makers without the need to train them to use business intelligence (BI) tools. It has also heightened the need for agreed semantic models and business metrics, as well as technologies that facilitate the sharing and consumption of data as a product. As I previously discussed, data as a product is the process of applying product thinking to data initiatives to ensure the outcome—the data product—is designed to be shared and reused for multiple use cases across the business as it enables enterprises to streamline and accelerate the delivery of analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) initiatives. The market for software that enables the design and delivery of data products is evolving rapidly, especially among providers of data catalog-based data intelligence software.
The idea of customer experience (CX) as a business practice relies heavily on being able to understand and track customer journeys. And that can be tricky because there isn’t a standard definition as to what a journey consists of. For example, inside a contact center the journey is perceived in terms of the steps a customer takes to achieve a particular result. Sometimes that is broadened out to include aspects of the customer’s history, especially when the business wants to use historical data to craft an offer or change a tactic.
The advances in data, analytics, Generative AI (GenAI) and agentic AI are transforming how healthcare and life sciences (HCLS) organizations deliver care, accelerate research, manage operations and engage patients. These innovations are driving measurable improvements in efficiency, accuracy and patient outcomes; however, adoption is not without challenges. Regulatory complexity, talent shortages, operational pressures and the need for responsible AI use demand thoughtful strategies. Organizations that can simultaneously innovate, scale responsibly and work closely with analytics partners to translate analytics goals into tangible outcomes will be the ones to succeed.
The Finance and Accounting Outsourcing (FAO) market in 2025 is undergoing one of the most significant shifts it has seen in the past decade. In contrast to 2024, when discussions surrounding AI, generative AI (GenAI) and advanced analytics primarily focused on pilots and early-stage PoCs, the current landscape is defined by operationalized innovation. Providers have transitioned from experimentation to deployment, embedding these technologies into live delivery environments and demonstrating measurable business impact.
Benchmarks ground strategy in reality by showing how you compare to peers on cost and performance. Used well, benchmarks reveal outliers to investigate and areas for improvement without pushing you to chase the lowest price or sacrifice quality.
Benchmarks reveal market-competitive rates and terms, letting you renegotiate with current providers instead of running a full RFP. That shortens time-to-value and reduces disruption while giving you the confidence that you’re paying a fair, defensible price.
A TCO benchmark looks at the whole solution, design, volumes, service levels, operating model and efficiency levers, so you spot bigger, more sustainable savings. Price-only benchmarks compare line items and can miss structural changes that lower overall cost.
No, benchmarks work best for fungible offerings with multiple suppliers. For proprietary products (e.g., software), pricing is shaped by bundles and SKU choices, so optimizing the bill of materials and total cost of ownership matters as much as discount level.